28. Passage II: Read the following passages carefully and answer questions 28-31
The Self-respecters' desire to found a community of rational, fraternal, freedom-loving citizens, equal and coeval with each other in every imaginable way was propelled forward by their conviction in the principle of what they habitually termed samadharma. Samadharma constituted the founding principle of the new republic they imagined and was conceived as a refutation of Manudharma. Samadharma assumed equality amongst men and between men and women as a given but, more important, it required that this equality be realized in and through an affirmation of each individual's self-respect.
The Self-Respecters were aware of the difficulties that stood in their way of achieving a social utopia animated by samadharma. For, the idea of samadharma was not available as a norm or a given towards which one may move; neither was it a pre-defined value that could be assumed at will by those who wished to live by it. It was an ideal that had to be constructed in and through acts of defiance and subversion of caste, religion-and reflections on these acts. In almost every instance; the Self-Respecters had to interpret and re-interpret the significance of these acts, and propose to an eager but bewildered constituency new ideas, new notions, different ways of seeing, hearing and being; in short, they had to cultivate and nurture a veritable new structure of feeling.
The Self-Respecters' ideal of samadharma then may be best understood as an idea-in-process; one that was never entirely grounded, either on the basis of a simple contradiction, such as, for instance, between brahrnins and non-brahrnins, or in antagonisms between rich and poor, capitalist and labourer, or landlord and worker. However, the fact that the principle of samadharma was left theoretically open-ended does not, of course, mean the application ofthis principle in practice was vague or ineffectual. The Self-Respecters at different times and contexts identified the ideal of samadharma with a set of clearly defined material attributes which they held ought to characterize the good society. Thus, the achievement ofproportional (communal) representation in the services, the evolution of common and shared rights of access-to public and sacral spaces, to property, education, employment -to all sections of the populace and the reorganization of society's social and economic life on the basis of socialist principles came to be acknowledged as valuable and desired material correlates of the principle of samadharma.
It must be noted here that for the Self-Respecters, samadharma was not merely the Tamil, local
equivalent of socialism, both as a term of reference and as a concept. On the other hand, though,
socialism existed as an aspect, an inalienable aspect of samadharma. The equality and sell-worth the Self-Respecters desired to instil and cultivate in countless non-brahmin hearts and minds required not merely the dawning of a new age of economic equality and public ownership of property, but the fulfilment of a millenarian dream, whereby caste society in its entirety and in all its complex ways of being, would be transformed.
The Self-Respecters' deployment of the term 'samadharma' was distinctive and differed, for instance, from M. Singarave1u's use and interpretation of the word. Singaravelu noted that only in the Tamil country had the word 'samadharma' been endowed with a socialist resonance and edge. He pointed out that in the context of Hindu thought, dharma, as defined in the Gita, for ex- ample, implied the performance of duties assigned to the caste of one's birth. The Buddha had however used the term to refer to a thing, to sheer materiality (vastu). If one were to understand the present import of the term in the context of the Buddha's use, one would see how it meant the 'ownership of property in common' (Pu 4.3.34). Amongst others who sought out Buddhist origins for samadharma, as a word and as an ideal, was the Buddhist scholar and long-time friend of the nonBrahmin movement, Professor Lakshminarasu. In an address delivered at a meeting of the South Indian Buddhist Association, he noted that the moral-spiritual basis for countering Hinduism 'which is inseparable from the brahmin (and who, in turn, is plagued by untouchability), can be had only in the creed of the Buddha, which, he declared, was the oldest samadharmic creed in existence. Buddha dharma which, historically, had resisted Hinduism and its brahmin priesthood, would alone enable Self-Respecters attain their ideals of self-respect and samadharma, in this instance socialism (KA 29.3.31).
{Geetha, V., Klta, V., & Rajaturai, E. V. (1998). Towards a Non-Brahmin Millennium: From Iyothee Thass to Periyar. Bhatkal & Sen. pp. 420-422}
Q. The authors argue that historically- (University of Hyderabad Ph.D 2022)