The legal approach to the integration of Indian states refers to the constitutional and legislative measures taken by the Indian government to unite the various princely states and provinces after India gained independence from British rule in 1947. The process of integrating Indian states was complex, given the diverse nature of political entities, including British Indian provinces, princely states, and territories under French and Portuguese control.

Key Elements of the Legal Approach to Integration

1. Instrument of Accession (1947)
   • After independence, the princely states had the option to join either India or Pakistan or remain independent. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the then Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister of India, spearheaded the integration effort.
   • Through the Instrument of Accession, princely states were legally integrated into India by voluntarily signing this agreement. This document allowed these states to transfer defense, foreign affairs, and communications to the Indian government while retaining internal autonomy.
2. States Reorganization Act (1956)
   • Post-independence, India’s political map was fragmented. The States Reorganization Act was passed in 1956, redrawing state boundaries based on linguistic lines. This legal reform aimed to align political boundaries with cultural and linguistic identities to promote better governance and integration.
3. Merger Agreements
   • Several princely states initially joined India through merger agreements, where rulers agreed to transfer all administrative powers to the central government in exchange for certain privileges, such as privy purses (payments to the former rulers).
   • States like Hyderabad, Junagadh, and Kashmir presented special challenges. The integration of Hyderabad, for example, required military intervention (Operation Polo) when the Nizam resisted joining India.
4. Article 370 and Special Provisions
   • Article 370 of the Indian Constitution granted special autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir, which acceded to India under special conditions. The state had its constitution and significant control over internal matters. However, in 2019, Article 370 was abrogated, and Jammu and Kashmir was fully integrated into India’s legal framework as a union territory.
5. Privy Purses Abolition (1971)
   • As part of further legal integration, the Indian government under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi abolished the privy purses and privileges of former princely rulers in 1971. This legal move was part of the process of creating a more egalitarian and uniform system of governance across India.
6. Integration of French and Portuguese Territories
   • French-controlled territories, such as Pondicherry, were integrated through treaties and agreements between India and France.
   • Goa, Daman, and Diu, under Portuguese control, were integrated after military intervention in 1961 through what was termed Operation Vijay. Following legal processes, these regions were incorporated into India as union territories, later becoming the state of Goa.

Conclusion

The legal approach to the integration of Indian states was a mix of diplomacy, constitutional reforms, legislative measures, and, in some cases, military action. It involved both the accommodation of regional identities and the assertion of central authority to form a unified nation. The process continues to evolve, especially with more recent legislative changes, such as the creation of new states and the bifurcation of existing ones.

The "Congress System," coined by Indian political scientist Rajni Kothari, describes the dominant position of the Indian National Congress in the early decades after India's independence. Kothari argued that the Congress functioned as an umbrella organization, encompassing diverse interests and ideologies, allowing it to maintain political dominance. Rather than suppressing opposition, the Congress co-opted various social groups and political factions, acting as a mediating force in India's pluralistic society. This system was marked by Congress's ability to adapt and absorb dissent, making it central to Indian politics while allowing space for regional and opposition parties to exist.

_____________

Morris Jones’ concept of the "One Party Dominant System" refers to a political framework in which a single party dominates the electoral landscape over an extended period, despite the existence of multiple parties. This system is characterized by the consistent success of the dominant party in elections, not through authoritarian means, but by its ability to represent a broad range of societal interests. In India's case, the Indian National Congress dominated the political scene after independence. The system allows opposition parties to function but limits their effectiveness in unseating the dominant party due to its institutional and electoral strength.

____________

Atul Kohli's concept of "Crisis in Governability" refers to the challenges India faced in the 1970s and 1980s in maintaining effective governance. Kohli argued that the Indian state's ability to govern was undermined by economic stagnation, political fragmentation, and social unrest. Rising demands from various social groups, weakening state institutions, corruption, and inefficient bureaucracy contributed to a decline in governability. Kohli observed that while democracy persisted, the state struggled to meet developmental goals and maintain political stability. This crisis reflected the growing gap between popular expectations and the state’s capacity to deliver, leading to political instability and discontent.